Civics · Supreme Court & Free Speech
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969): Two Perspectives
Question 1 of 8
The blog entry and speech excerpt below discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), in which students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War.
📝 Blog
In the Tinker v. Des Moines case, the Court ruled that students lawfully exercised their rights when they wore black armbands in school as a protest against the Vietnam War. The ruling stated that school officials were wrong to suspend students from school for their act of protest. Students are not required to give up their rights when they enter a public school, especially freedom of speech, which is the foundation of democracy. These students modeled good citizenship by their actions. In contrast, school representatives placing restrictions on liberty provided a bad example to the future leaders of our country.
🎤 Speech
I believe the U.S. Supreme Court ruled correctly in Tinker v. Des Moines. Democracy requires individual expression, debate, and public protest. Still, freedom of speech is not the only issue to be considered when protests occur in public schools. School officials have a responsibility to provide a safe environment that is not disruptive to learning. Individual expression should not interfere with a school's mission to teach.
Blog Position
Strongly pro-student rights. Schools should never restrict free speech. Students modeled good citizenship.
Speech Position
Supports the ruling but adds a qualifier: free speech has limits when it disrupts a school's mission.
Question 1 of 8
Score: 0 / 0
0
/ 8
